Data penelitian berupa kalimat dalam klaim yang ditulis mahasiwa UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang pada mata kuliah menulis kritis.
Rancangan yang digunakan kualitatif dengan objek refleksi berpikir kritis dalam tulisan untuk memahami lompatan nalar yang ditemukan.
Key Words: fallacy, claims, logos, ethos, pathosĪbstract: Penelitian ini mengkaji lompatan nalar dalam karangan argumentatif berjenis faktual, nilai dan kebijakan. On claims of policy, the similar tendency of ethos is also found while the pathos existing is in the form of appeal to emotion premises. While the ethos fallacy occurs in appeal to authority and ad hominem. The pa-thos found involves appeal to emotion premises and red herring. In the logos fallacy for instance, the whole types of fallacy are found. On claims of value, more faulty reasoning is found compared to the discussion on the topics which are considered less familiar. Meanwhile the ethos fallacy occurs in straw man only. Regarding pathos, the fallacy type covers ad populum, appeal to emotion premises and red herring.
On claims of fact, the fallacies found include hasty generalization, irrelevancy, slippery slope, oversimplification and begging the question. The data are in the form of the sentences in the claims written by the students of UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang who took critical writing course. It employs qualitative design as the object is the real reflection of critical thinking in the form of writing to understand the fallacies varieties. Abstract: This study focuses on the fallacies found in English department students’ claims of fact, value and policy.
0 kommentar(er)
